Mentorship Review: Feedback To Radiology Residents

Analysis of Radiology Feedback

Radiology Feedback Analysis

Group Overview

This interactive report analyzes the chat history of the "Feedback for residents KH" WhatsApp group, an educational platform for radiology residents and consultants. The following sections break down the key insights, themes, and patterns observed from July 2023 to May 2025.

πŸ—“️

Duration

22 Months

July 2023 - May 2025

πŸ’¬

Total Messages

500+

Estimated count

πŸ‘¨‍🏫

Primary Contributor

Dr. Sharad

>80% of messages

πŸ‘₯

Participants

Growing Group

Residents & Consultants

Key Educational Themes

The conversations revolved around several core topics essential for radiology training. Click on a tab below to explore the detailed feedback and guidance provided in each area. This section highlights the curriculum-in-practice driven by Dr. Sharad's mentorship.

Focus on Common Errors

A significant portion of the feedback was dedicated to identifying and correcting common diagnostic errors. Understanding these pitfalls is crucial for improving accuracy and patient safety. The main error categories highlighted are detailed below.

πŸ“’

Overcalling Findings

Incorrectly identifying pathology where none exists. A key example is reporting bladder wall thickening in an undistended bladder, which can be a normal finding. The guidance emphasizes the need for technical rigor, such as ensuring proper bladder distention before making a call.

🀫

Missing Subtle Findings

Failing to detect small but clinically significant abnormalities. Frequent examples included overlooked small renal calculi, subtle appendicitis, or small bladder lesions. This feedback underscores the importance of a systematic search pattern and using tools like thin MIP for stone detection.

✍️

Dictation & Terminology Issues

Using imprecise or non-standard language. Corrections included avoiding "prominent bowel loops" in favor of "dilated" with specific measurements, or confusing "hypo" vs. "hyper" dense. This reinforces the need for structured, unambiguous reporting.

Timeline of Learning Evolution

The group's discussions evolved significantly over the 22-month period, reflecting the residents' growing expertise. Early topics focused on fundamentals, while later conversations tackled more complex cases and advanced technologies. Click on a year below to see the thematic focus for that period.

Group Dynamics & Contribution

The group's educational value was overwhelmingly driven by Dr. Sharad, who acted as the primary mentor. This chart visualizes the estimated message distribution, highlighting the mentor-led nature of this learning environment.

Comments